Anywho, this will be my first weekend in
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Road Trip...
Monday, September 24, 2007
Ella, ella, ella, ella...
Friday, September 21, 2007
About a third of people interviewed said they wished they'd waited...and thats probably a low number
I think my girlfriend and I need to have a little talk this evening. About...Abstinence, Abstinence. C'mon sing along!
Week 3: Crystal Balls Full of Bong Water
In other news, we went 0-2 in out First Tier Confidence Picks and decided to mix it up a little and went 0-2 and in our Second Tier Picks as well. This week? Well, there aren't any "Picks We Like So Much We Wanna Take 'Em Out Behind the Middle School and Get Them Pregnant" this week. We just couldn't generate consensus around any one game ATS. Our second tier games would be the Cowboys getting 3 and a hook against the Bears (except Jerry disagrees), the Seahawks only laying a few at home versus the Bengals and Denver over Jax...but only three of us agree on any one of those.
Overall, this group has gone a pitiful 15-16-4 ATS so far. Awful--with me, and to an only slightly lesser extent Mark to blame. The individual breakouts will appear prior to each person’s picks. Here’s a hint—go with TJ…and Whit for all Falcons games.
Geoff (1-4-1 ATS)
Moving on… I believe it was last year that Jerry first offered his theory of “teams regress to their appropriate record” at certain points throughout the season. The theory makes a lot of sense to me and also is an effective crutch to lean on when trying to explain the inexplicable outcomes commonplace in the NFL regular season. It also conveniently applies to each of the games I’m picking this week, which all feature surprise 2-0 teams versus unqualified disappointments. One problem: I can’t seem to force myself to abide by this theory…which brings me to my next point…
I’d like to once again direct your attention to my 1-4-1 record ATS record so far this season. As many people will tell you, it’s been quite an odd and unpredictable year through two weeks, but that excuse really doesn’t apply to me. I was picking this poorly for most of last season too. So, consider this your warning (or, opportunity?) that you should not trust these picks at all (or just go directly against them). Throwing darts at a board, asking advice from that girl you go out with regularly who’s is NOT your girlfriend or just picking the team with the least Methodists (legendarily the pussies of Protestantism) on their roster are all preferable to taking my advice. And with that…on to the picks…
Philadelphia (-6.5) vs. Detroit – Much like Mayhugh’s drapes scream at us “We were stolen from the “All in the Family” set,” what does this line scream at us other than “PLEASE bet on the Lions”? The Eagles backs are against the wall and their shirttails are on fire. But here’s my struggle: Donovan McNabb looked so bad on Monday night, I’m not sure I can pick the Eagles. And don’t get me started on Andy Reid’s boneheaded coaching. Everyone’s focusing on the time out call that preceded the Cooley TD, but check out these more damning coaching misfires. The Eagles averaged 5.9 yards per carry against the Redskins on Monday night…but they only ran the ball 15 times the entire game. That is idiotic in and of itself, but even more confusing is that Reid only ran the ball to the right side one time all game even though Phillip Daniels was out with an injured foot and was being replaced by Demetric Evans…who plays the run about as well as my sister. I don’t get it. Also, I’ve got news for the Eagles—Kevin Curtis sucks. He was shut down by Carlos Rogers like nothing I’ve seen. He simply could not get open…because he’s too slow and too goofy and white. I think the Eagles could scrape together a win in their gay powder blue unis, but I’m not remotely convinced of it, so I’m taking the six and a hook. LIONS
Michael Strahan/Barry Cofield versus Todd Wade/Jason Fabini – I don’t think I need to explain this one too much here. So far both of these guys (Fabini and Wade) have been fine in protection (though Strahan should be a new and interesting challenge for Wade) but have looked less than stellar on running plays. On Monday night the Skins only ran to their side on five out of 27 running plays, and I fear that the Skins could struggle to run the ball this Sunday. Minus Jason Campbell’s 40 yards rushing, they Skins were only able to rush the ball for 91 yards against Philly (on 27 carries), but they still found a way to move the ball…which leads me to…
Moss/ARE/Cooley versus R.W. McQuarters, Corey Webster and the Giants LBs – If weeks one and two are any indicator, the Redskins should be able to bebop and scat all over the Giants LBs and secondary. The problem is, they’re not really into that sorta thing. The Redskins have in recent years displayed a distinct inability to capitalize on their opponents defensive shortcomings. If they do that again this weekend, I fear bad things.
So, enough hemming and hawing…after going back and forth on this one for a while, it comes down to the fact that I think the Redskins are just playing better football than the Giants right now and that’s why I’m taking them. REDSKINS
Ah yes, one final point—the Skins will be wearing these getups on Sunday as part of the 75th Anniversary celebration. These are throwbacks to the unis when Vince Lombardi was coaching the Skins, and it doesn’t take Pierre Cardin to tell you that Vince changed them up to look like his old Packers uniforms. I like ‘em…but let’s be honest, this is all just about selling merchandise…predominantly to rappers.
Mark (2-4-0 ATS)
Did anybody else think they were watching a Coors Light commercial when they first saw the footage of Mike Ditka testifying before Congress? No? Well, I bet none of you dicks picked the score of last week’s Broncos-Raiders game within a point either. Who’s awesome? This guy. (both thumbs pointing toward chest) Anyway, on to this week’s picks.
Rob (2-2-1 ATS)
Indianapolis (-6) @ Houston - The Texans didn’t make the cover of Sports Illustrated this week, but they’ve fallen victim to an even more insidious hex – the Curse of the Wounded Wideout. Stud receiver Andre Johnson (for my money, the league’s most underrated skill position player) gorked his knee in last week’s win against Carolina and is out for this big one against the Colts (and, additionally, my intra-division fantasy matchup with the notorious Corcoran brothers). Johnson tallied 58% of the Texans’ 452 passing yards in their two season-opening wins and all of their receiving touchdowns. The list of pass catchers in line to face the Colts includes Owen Daniels, Vonta Leach, Jacoby Jones, Kevin Walter, and Jeb Putzier. I’m a bit slow on the uptake from time to time, but I’m fairly certain that this can’t be a good thing for the Texans. (If you care, I’ll be replacing Johnson with Deion Branch in my lineup this week – that’s a bit less of a dropoff than Matt Schaub’s facing.)
New England (-16.5) vs.
Buges has spent the whole week cackling about the odd names on the Giants’ roster. He’s been telling anyone that’ll listen how Osi reminds him of a Filipino hooker he used to know. Talented girl. Talented girl. Giants beat the number.
Whit (3-2-1 ATS)
NY Giants (+4) @ Washington - 17 years ago Rob and I traveled up to the DC area from
Pic taken by Whit at aforementioned game.
TJ (4-1-1 ATS)
NY JETS -3 vs.
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue: You get two here, because the stat for the Raiders/Browns game doesn't jive with who I'm picking. The Dolphins are 6-22 ATS in their last 28 games vs. the AFC East. Not convinced? The Dolphins are also 4-18-1 ATS in their last 23 meetings against the Gang Green.
PITT -9 vs. SF - Yes, I think Pittsburgh coach Mike Tomlin is doing a terrific job in his first two weeks as the head man. And yes,
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue: The Steelers are 2-7 ATS vs. a team with a winning record. And will you look at that, the 49ers are 2-0. Shazam.
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue: The Seahawks are 9-4-1 ATS in their last 14 home games.
OAK -3 vs. Cleveland - Whooohooo, my picking prowess in Weeks 1 and 2 mean I get a 4th game this week. Wait, what?? That game is Browns at Raiders? F U pal. I know,
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue: Here's the stat I would've used if I thought Cleveland had any shot. Which I don't. The Browns are 7-1 ATS in their last 8 games in Week 3. That's like finding out Dark Helmet is Lone Starr's father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate. It means absolutely nothing.
Jerry (3-3-0 ATS)
Dallas (+3.5) at
Friday, September 14, 2007
Week 2: Mazeltov!
We’ll start off this week with a new feature that I am unilaterally electing to name “This Week’s Lines That We Like So Much We Want to Take Them Back Behind the Middle School and Get Them Pregnant.” It’s pretty simple—in addition to our pithy picks sniglets, the six of us will get together every week and pick three to five games that we all really like (more than friends) ATS. Here are this week’s:
This Week’s Lines That We Like So Much We Want to Take Them Back Behind the Middle School and Get Them Pregnant aka Supreme Confidence Locks of the Week:
Cincy (-6.5) over Cleveland – Usually you don’t look to a 6.5 point road dog to be one of your locks…but you also usually don’t see teams as God awful as the Browns. The guy who started at QB for them opening day (aka last week)? Yeah, he’s no longer with the franchise. Bet that’s never happened before.
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue:
The Panthers are 3-7 ATS in their last 10 home games.
...
...
You done? Couldn't do it, could you? The spread could be 20 in this game and the Bengals could be starting this guy at QB and I'd still be taking Cincy. [Note to Swint: This is free money. Tell Moose and Rocco you want to put at least a grand on this one.] Expect Phil Savage to trade Derek Anderson on Tuesday to the Frankfurt Galaxy (do they even exist anymore?) and replace him on the roster with Brock
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue:
The Bengals are 15-4-1 ATS in their last 20 road games.
NY Jets @
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue:
The Jets are 10-2 ATS vs. a team with a losing record.
Jerry
When you get assigned games with spreads of 7, 3, and 0, it pretty much means that Vegas has no idea what's going to happen. They threw up their hands, found the closest football number that separates the teams, and let the betting public think amongst themselves. Be prepared for the least insightful trio of predictions you'll see in a while. Truth is, I wouldn't touch any of these games, even if I had all of Geoff's "old credenza" money.
Packers @ Giants (pick'em) – Over on the Giants message board, people were trying to make themselves feel better about the Green Bay game by invoking the memory of Jeff Hostetler's 1990 run to the Super Bowl as a backup QB. I'd just like to think of Hostetler's mustache on Jared Lorenzen's face.
I have no idea what to make of this game, so I'll just discuss something Giants-related that's been confusing me recently. In 2000, Jim Fassel pushed his chips to the middle of the table and took over play-calling duties from Sean Payton. The Giants offensive production increased by about 50%. In 2006, Brian Billick took over play-calling duties from Jim Fassel. The Ravens offensive production increased by 50%. Also in 2006, Sean Payton took over the Saints play-calling duties and they had the #1 offense in the league. Try explaining that one, smart guy.
The feeling here is that Eli doesn't play and the Packers win a really boring game that turns on 3-5 really weird plays. All the while Favre and Lorezen would rather be shooting and eating deer. Packers
Colts (+7) @ Titans – I've spent the past 15 minutes trying to make up some jokes about Tony Dungy's best-selling book, but I can't find a bad word about it anywhere on the internet. Amazon.com has 41 out of 44 reviews as 5 stars, and the other 3 are 4 stars. I find this deeply disturbing. The internet – a place where you could probably find video of a horse screwing a physics student – has nothing bad to say about this best-selling book. No snarky bloggers. No religion-hating extremists. No anti-sap logic-mongers. No Patriots fans complaining that Belichick's book should've sold more copies. Nothing. I'm scared.
There are two ways this game could play out: 1) Colts aerial rout or 2)
In honor of Geoff's post earlier this week, I'll be picking against St. Louis because of the massive hole that Orlando "Tubby" Pace leaves on the left side of the offensive line. It really is a huge loss and the Rams offense was markedly worse after Pace left the game on Sunday. 49ers.
Now put your money on Vinneus' Eagles. 21-13.
Jerry made an interesting point the other night—if Wade Phillips didn’t look like a mix between John Candy and Captain Kangaroo, he would probably be a much more well-respected coach. I mean, his defenses have always been solid and he’s over .500 as a head coach. But I, like everyone else, still think of him as a small town sheriff in some backwoods
KC (+13) @ Chicago – As I once heard Steve Mariucci yell on the Niners sideline, “Holy wow!” 13 points? I had a brief inkling to pick the Chieves to cover here, but then I remembered watching the Chargers-Bears game and even with the injuries, I can’t really foresee a scenario in which the Chiefs get a first down against the Bears defense in this one. By the way, for those of us who watched Hard Knocks, it was nice to get a chance to see what Larry Johnson spent his month long holdout doing: Painting…poorly. Did anyone see that picture he was working on of Jim Brown? It looked like he was trying to draw the solar system or something. And how about Dwayne Bowe and Chris Sippio realizing they were cousins after being on the same team for over a week? This never happens to anyone I know. I mean, I found out after working here for a year that hot dog eating phenom Joey Chestnutt’s sister works in my building and I felt like I had had my head buried in the sand…but I’m pretty sure there aren’t any level one blood relatives here…and if there were, and I was introduced to them…I would know within seconds, let alone weeks, that we were “kin,” as they say in the South. My point? Bears, 24-7. (Defensive TD for KC on a SexyRexy INT/fumble/bedwetting)
Mark
Saints @ Bucs (+3.5) - Both of these teams lost last week by significant margins to teams who were recent Super Bowl participants and picked to win their respective divisions. So, this should be a close game, right? Umm, no. The Saints are good and the Bucs, well, let’s just say that that they should be happy they don’t play in the AFC. They’d undoubtedly be the worst team the entire conference. As it stands now, the Bucs may not even be the worst team in their own division. In other news, I’m starting to come around on the whole Mike Vick thing. He seems like a nice enough fellow and all. As for this game, I have a distinct feeling it’s going to look a whole lot more like the second meeting between these two teams last year (A blowout victory for N.O. featuring Saints receivers running open and free all over the secondary) then the first (A close game clinched by Reggie Bush’s first NFL TD, a punt return TD). To be honest, depending on the way tomorrow’s Florida-Tennessee game goes I may not even care if the Bucs even show up come Sunday afternoon. Saints 31- 10
Seattle @
Thursday, September 06, 2007
Week 1: Well, That Certainly Looks Like a Lot of Words
Jerry
Tradition. Fat mustachioed fans. Two "classy" coaches. Clouds.
Shrinking cities. Three yard off-tackle runs. Unusual color schemes.
Two teams that "flat-out don't like each other." Yup, this game has it all, and then some.
If somebody asked me to sum up the difference in media coverage between foreign and American sports, I might say that the CBS broadcast of this heated rivalry is guaranteed to feature some sort of QB comparison graphic that says, "Roethlisberger with Fryes."
Prediction: The Fryes will be soggy, the Berger will be well-done, the bun won't even have sesame seeds, and Willie Parker will provide more than enough shake to easily cover the spread. Then Romeo Crenell will eat all of them in an effort to close the 10 fanny-pack gap that his old buddy Charlie Weis has opened up on him.
Who will win? I don't know. I don't know very much about football.
It's difficult to even think about such a violent game after such a tranquil meal. All I know is, good luck, Men of Linehan. This neutral observer will be hoping the Ram-Men can cast one more ray of sunshine through the misty autumn clouds of this fine woman's life.
Rams.
Giants (+6) at
Woody Paige on the Giants: "I don't like this team, I don't like the quarterback, and I really don't like Tom Coughlin."
Some preview of this game : "Giants at Cowboys. Division rivals split the 2006 series, but N.Y. is headed south, while
Some terrible writer on msnbc.com claimed there are 24 QBs he'd rather have over Eli Manning, including Batch, Huard, Garcia, Leinart, Smith, and Leftwich.
I haven't seen a team, (bear in mind a team that has made consecutive playoff appearances), that has been so thoroughly blasted in the media in such a vapidly superficial way. No doubt, the Giants have some concerns, most notably a dreadful secondary, but everything you hear is Barber, Coughlin, Manning stinks. Not much meat on that bone. Now I have a pretty healthy dislike for Coughlin and I think he's a pretty terrible coach, but the Giants have shown they can win games with him stomping around like a hyper-active 60 year old toddler on the sidelines.
Something that a lot of people seem to be forgetting is that the Giants have been pretty good when they're relatively healthy. In 2005 they went 11-5 and won the division. In 2006, they started 6-2, led the Bears at home on Sunday night before going on to completely self-destruct. But they still made the playoffs at 8-8, which is kind of a joke. Injuries are a fact of life in the NFL and nobody gives a damn if your guys are hurt, so I won't be whining about them, but they should be a consideration when projecting a team's prospects for the following year.
For what it's worth, Eli has looked fantastic in the pre-season, sharp, accurate, composed. He's going to get better. And he hasn't been that bad. I'm constantly amazed by the amount of stick Eli takes in the media, especially versus other young QBs. You hear people gush about Alex Smith and Matt Leinart. I even heard somebody say "We know Tavaris Jackson is a good QB…" although that was probably an isolated comment. Eli is better than those guys. He really is. He's not a great player right now by any means, but he's pretty decent and he's still going to improve. Barring massive injuries, the Giants are going to have a good offense this year. The defense will have some problems and is going to lose their share of battles, but they also have a good pass rush and the ability to counteract a negative series of plays by getting pressure on the QB. I don't like this Giants team that much, but they're a lot better than they're getting credit for. Giants.
Whitney
A year ago the Vikings were the ones groin-deep in controversy, as the final dust was settling on Freddie Smoot and his fellow nautical enthusiasts. A year later Smoot's in Redskins camp while Michael Vick is headed to federal prison (some might say a comparable fate), and it's the Falcons who are looking at a long rebuilding season. Word on the street is that Chris Chandler is mulling a comeback, despite the fact that it could result in serious head injuries for him and me. The fact that I'm kidding and yet he might be the Falcons' best good chance against Tarvaris Jackson spells very bad newz for
Some years ago we were throwing back a few pints in a pub in
Super Bowl XVII this ain't. The decent Dolphins D ain't the Killer B's; same goes for the albeit-improved Skins' defense as compared to Butz, Milot, Manley, & Co. Ronnie Brown has been only marginally better than the forgettable Andra Franklin, and Portis & Betts (together they're Bettis?) still don't stack up to Riggo. But most importantly, Trent & Jason aren't even Woodley & Theismann, and boy, is that saying something. This game will be the first bleeding eyesore of the season. Enjoy. Redskins 9, Dolphins 7.
Rob
Huard versus Schaub. Not exactly Manning versus Brady. The Texans have jumped ugly on unsuspecting teams in a handful of their season openers*, and the fabled HBO Curse has crippled lesser teams than the Chiefs. Okay, the curse has crippled teams with lesser head coaches. Strike that. The curse has crippled teams with fewer words in the names of their home towns. Noted prognosticator T. Geofferson Burrrrrr whiffed on the
* - Note: this may be purely anecdotal and not necessarily backed by any actual facts.
Most important DNP: Brodie Croyle, because putting him on the field all but assures an injury, and his comely wife won’t have that.
I’ve paid next to zero attention to either of these teams during the preseason, so I know just about nothing about their prospects. I was gonna go with the Bills because I like Marshawn Lynch’s name, but then Denver went and picked up Simeon Rice to counter Buffalo’s naming advantage. In actual fact, I don’t think the Bills will be very good, and I’m a sucker for Mike Shanahan. Broncos’ long-standing grudge against the Bills’ namesake will prove decisive in this one.
Most important DNP: Jake Plummer. Natch.
The Dolphins and Skins meet in a Super Bowl rubber match, with Garo Yepremian and Mike Bass on tap to re-enact the most awkward pass in Washington history – well, next to Larry Craig’s incomplete effort. Cam Cameron’s new-agey coaching theories and cutting-edge use of the same first and last name has Joe Gibbs and his geriatric staff in a complete tizzy in the days before the game. Joe Bugel’s paralyzed with indecision, trying desperately to figure out whether to punch Cameron in the neck or hit Al Saunders in the mouth. Meanwhile, Clinton Portis just realized that he’s paid to play football and that his backup may in fact be a fairly adept running back. Look for a big game from No. 26, right up until he bruises his shin trying to tackle Mike Wise. Dolphins win outright.
Most important DNP: Mark Brunell, because if he’s called on to enter the game, emergency rooms throughout the National Capital Region will experience a marked spike in laceration injuries from frustrated Skins fans putting their fists through their television screens.
Geoff
Dolphins +3 @ Redskins
Number of snaps the Skins starting offense took as a complete unit this preseason: Zero. Pete Kendall and Chris Samuels will be taking their first live snap next to each other on Sunday at FedEx. That said, the Redskins preseason performance this year looked far different compared to last year's Spurrier-esque showing (who loses a preseason game 41-0...seriously?). At the least this iteration looked…what’s the word? Ah yes, competitive…and at it’s best, their defense looked like it might be an elite level unit again. But come Sunday, one wonders if Jason Campbell will be nervous in his first season opener as "the man"? He shouldn't be--he started seven games last year. But Greg told me I'd be an idiot to be nervous at my wedding, and yet I still was while waiting for the ceremony to start...so go figure. I've hedged and equivocated quite a bit, but I’m optimistic about this Skins team--which means I think they could be at or above .500 heading into December with at least a chance to do something…
And then there's the Phins: They suck. Their offensive line is ghastly, Trent Green is the "answer" only if the question is "Who has two thumbs, is 37 and loves a good gyro?" and their vaunted defense is aging like a fine milk. I like the Skins 24-14.
Saints +6 @ Indianapolis
On a recent flight, I finished reading the vomit bag and the passenger safety guide (showing pictures of people smiling calmly whilst using their seat cushion as a flotation device juxtaposed against a flaming water bound aircraft in the background) and was ultimately relegated to reading American Airlines in flight magazine. It featured a cover story on Drew Brees that delved into every aspect of his life, save for the interesting ones (What’s that thing on his face? Why Purdue? When’s the last time you took the old lady to
How many times in the last 10 seasons have the Packers been a 6 point dog at Lambeau? I say…infrequently… And, you really have to give it the media for standing strong on their Favre-love. The blogsphere/counterculture mocking of the media for the unabashed Favre fellatio has been going strong for 4 years now, and the talking heads are still showing no sign of relenting. I’ve personally tired of it and am conceding victory. Favre is “great” and “everything that’s right with America” and “plays football the way it’s meant to be played” and “has a penis so large they could project a drive in movie on it” and “makes minorities, old people and puppies smile with his greatitude” and “throws tight spirals of honeysuckle and magic into the hearts of all ruddy faced children.” Eagles, 38-9.
TJ
New England @ NY JETS (+6.5)Not the way I want the Jetropolitans season to open, against everyone's Super Bowl sweetheart New England. It's the cougar-hunting, hooded sweatshirt-wearing Mentor against The Mangenius. Hey, Bill, you know who really pulls off the hooded look? This guy.
Mangenius did get the cameo on the penultimate Sopranos episode, so his Q rating is off the charts. HOWEVAH, I have serious concerns about the Jets offensive line, and fear Brady and his new brand of offensive weapons will dismantle the Jets secondary. I am very sad to see NW released Raccon Eyes Caldwell, because the close-ups of him in the NE/San Diego playoff game last year were priceless. He looked more clueless than Cliff Clavin on Jeopardy.
Enough delaying the obvious - the Jets are starting the season 0-1 (and failing to cover). Man do the Patriots drive me crazy.
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue:
The Patriots are 7-1-1 ATS in the last 9 meetings.
Baltimore @ CINCINNATI (-2.5)
Well lucky me, I get both Monday night games this week. And lucky for you, the viewer, you get a Joe Theismann-less booth for the entire year. I saw Joe on the MASN simulcast of the John Riggins show yesterday, and let me just say, I’m not gonna miss him in the least. Then I heard he was discussing prostates on the Junkies this morning. Is that awful male version of The View still around, the one with AC Slater and Danny Bonaduce? If so, Joe should be a regular. What does Joe have to do with the Ravens/Bengals game? Absolutely nothing at all.
The actual game...well, I despise Brian Billick, in a LaRussian sort of way. I am convinced Steve McNair will turn to dust on the field this year, Friz Freleng-style. Dust that Devard Darling will try to snort mid-play. Look, Troy Smith made the roster - he spends his nights prank calling Eric Crouch and Jason White. All these unconnected statements simply lead to me taking Carson Palmer and the Bengals (and look, I waited all the way 'til the end to mention that Palmer is on my fantasy team). Shayne Graham boots a 45 yarder as time expires for the cover.
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue:
The home team is 11-5 ATS in the last 16 meetings.
Arizona @ SAN FRANCISCO (-3)
The booth for this game - Mike and Mike...and Mike. Awesome. Can't get enough of those guys. Greenberg, Golic and Ditka for three plus hours. Alex Smith wants everyone know he does not have small hands and he most definitely does not smell like cabbage. Matt Leinart would like to be the white version of procreation machine Travis Henry. Everyone seems to think Arizona will be good this year, but even if they score 30 a game their defense blows. At least I say it does - I have nether the time nor the energy to look up actual stats. I'm taking San Fran by at least a touchdown in this game, mainly because Dennis just sent me this Rotoworld "Gem of the Day": According to the San Francisco Chronicle, TE Vernon Davis is rumored to have dated Serena Williams.
It's just a rumor of course, but that potential genetic combination is pretty amazing. Boy or girl the kid would probably be wearing spandex, running a 4.4 40-yard dash and bench pressing 350 pounds by the second grade. We don't normally play cupid here at Rotoworld, but this really needs to happen.
Gambling stat that makes me look like I know what I’m doing when I really don't have a clue:
The 49ers are 14-3 ATS in their last 17 MNF games.
Mark
Tennesee @ Jacksonville (-7)
By now most of you have read that former Jaguars QB Byron Leftwich was "euphoric" when he learned of his release from Jacksonville late last week. Most have assumed this is b/c of his often rocky relationship with his former axe-wielding, suit wearing maniac meathead of a coach, Jack Del Rio. While this is a solid theory, I have it on good authority that the real reason for Leftwich's exultation was that he had recently caught a glimpse of Reggie Nelson's penis in the locker room and said penis was so monstrous in size that it had been haunting Leftwich's dreams ever since. While cutting Leftwich came as a surprise to most, I can't see how it matters much come Sunday, since Tennessee has exactly one offensive skill position player who is worth a shit in Vince Young. The Jacksonville defense is a juggernaut built to stop the Colts offense so I'm having a tough time imagining them struggling to contain the likes of LenDale White & Bo Scaife. Sorry Titans fans, Yancey Thigpen isn't walking through that door. Even if he did, his chronic case of ass herpes would render him largely ineffective.
19-7 Jags.
Tampa Bay @ Seattle (-6)
I'd like to optimistic about Tampa's chances this year. However, based on last year's prediction it's safe to say I don't have a goddamn clue what I'm talking about. Here's what I do know:
Cadillac Williams is perpetually banged up, Michael Clayton isn't starting and Jeff Garcia is nailing a Playboy Playmate despite the fact that he's (a) bald and (b) wears a do rag underneath his helmet. Life ain't fair kids.
Don't believe me? Go ask David Boston about his recent experience with the fine folks at the Tampa Police Department.
Seattle is back after an injury plagued post Super Bowl season and looks scary good on offense once again with Deion Branch acclimated to the West Coast Offense and Shaun Alexander healthy. Additionally, FB Leonard Weaver will supply the offense with an additional pass catching dimension out of the backfield that Mack Strong never could, due to splitting time between Seattle and Vivid Video. (Actually, that's probably not true at all but Weaver and I went to the same high school. Go Scorpions!). Either way, Seattle better be ready to put some points on the board with regularity this year because I don't see how their defense stops any competent offense unless they figure out a way to clone Lofa Tatupu 10 times over. Luckily enough for Seattle, they're playing the Bucs who haven't had a competent offense since Doug Williams was banging cocktail waitresses two at a time in Ybor City.
31-17 Seahawks.
Chicago @ San Diego (-5.5)
Has the statute of limitations on referring to San Diego as "whale's vagina"
in an NFL picks column run out? God I hope so. Seriously, we get it. It's from Anchorman and Anchorman is funny. You know what else is funny? Watching Rex Grossman try to handle the QB-Center exchange. How did Alex Smith get stuck with the small hands label with Grossman running around fumbling like a pre-Coughlin era Tiki Barber? God only knows. Luckily for you, God's not the only person who knows that Rex spent last night pissing himself at the thought of Shawne Merriman coming off the edge unmolested.
How pathetic of a QB do you have to be replaced by a guy who once injured himself tripping over his dog whilst heavily overserved? Well, we're about find out. The over/under on Griese replacing Rex is Week 6*. I'll take the under, thank you. As for this game, Norv Turner could've probably guided Team USA to a semifinal loss to Puerto Rico in last week's Tournament of the Americas but even he won't be able to fuck this game up. Have no fear AFC fans, he'll make sure he takes care of sabotaging this Charger team eventually. If I had to guess, I'd say somewhere around Week 11. The nauseating Super Bowl hangover begins tonight Chicago. Have fun with that.
* May be completely untrue.
27-10 Chargers.
Okay fellas...candlesticks always make a nice gift. Let's get two...